02.19.08

Missional Order: Two Lenses

Posted in ekklesia, emergence, formation, gospel, leadership, mission, missional order at 6:00 am by len

In most of my writing post-Seabeck I viewed the creation of a missional order through the lens of covenant renewal (see this post as well as others). But there is another lens, equally valid and equally valuable, and it fits nicely with the direction of my dissertation: the lens of culture formation. I understand the church as an alternative (kingdom) culture, and I see one of the central tasks of leadership as cultivating alternative practices. Culture is a cultivating force, and we are formed by the soil we grow in, primarily through what we practice – our habits become “habits of the heart.” Alan Roxburgh writes that the work of leaders,

“will equip and support the congregation on its journey, however tentative and exploratory that may be. But what determines these skills and strategies for leadership is the larger image of the pilgrim people of God as a covenant community. The leaders primary skills are directed toward intentionally forming such orders within the community.

“This can only happen as leaders themselves participate in such orders. Leaders must exert the greatest attention and energy at this point for a number of reasons. First, it is the covenant community that witnesses to the gospel as an alternative logic and narrative within the social context, including in particular the larger unbounded congregation. Second, this area is precisely where leaders have been given almost no preparation; there are few models from which they can learn. The leaders themselves must therefore become a novitiate, embark on a missional apprenticeship, in order to give the kind of direction needed by the emerging missional community. This is a demanding task that cannot be given a secondary role in the church.” (Missional Church, 211)

Perhaps we are more ready to embrace covenant structures in these days because we are becoming comfortable with paradox. We are more ready to entertain the possibility that freedom and rule can live together, in fact that a rule of life can root and empower freedom. Covenant becomes a vehicle for shared exploration, a shared journey, but a journey with focus and intention. Moreover, because it is foundational to discipline, it is a tool that assists us in transcending ego. And ego, as we know too well, is the primary pitfall of leadership. We too quickly choose the easy path, when it is the upward path that builds strength. Water flows naturally downhill. Our disciplines draw us to the ascent.

We are readily attracted and distracted to the wrong things. Our market culture is designed to keep us thinking about self and consumption. SO we need culture forming and character forming disciplines to keep us focused on a different vision – on a city we have not seen.
The disciplines that form alternative culture are alternative practices. In Hopeful Imagination Walter Brueggemann reminds us of the need:

“Our problem today: the space for imagination to expand and take shape is inversely proportional to the speed at which we live. Driven hard and fast, we lack the time to allow alternate worlds and possibilities to form, careening past small turnings and exits, bound to follow the obvious straight paths of the present arrangement. Yet if we stop and wait, and close our eyes to the “buy now, take me now” images, we will begin to remember, new worlds will form and new exits will become apparent. Before change.. comes waiting..” (56-57)

So instead of fast, we choose slow. Instead of big, we choose small. Instead of up, we choose down. Instead of self-protection, we choose vulnerability. Instead of hording our time, we choose availability. Instead of rationalism, we choose faith.

Instead of anxiety and drivenness, we choose to wait. We choose to give time to God and to prayer and to study rather than believing the lie that the kingdom is something we build in our own strength. We choose to believe the gospel that the kingdom is a gift that we receive. We confront the lie that Imperial reality offers peace in limitless consumption and limitless growth. We believe Isaiah, whose poetry tilts toward freedom and liberation within the covenant. Brueggemann reminds us that

“This subversive poetry has an unavoidable political realism to it. It knows that the yearned-for liberation will not happen until there is a dismantling of imperial definitions of reality. That is where the missional activity of Israel is called to be — defiantly and buoyantly against every imperial definition of reality. And so he speaks with nerve and authority, believing that his speech is not idle or futile, but that it plays a part in the dismantling.

“We live in a time of domesticated hopes, weary voices and co-opted imaginations. Now is not a good time to join issue with the enslaving structures of the day (cf. Amos 5:13) (Covenant as a Subversive Paradigm)

I meet this week with four others to talk about initiating a missional order. Perhaps with the same terror that Andrew Jones experienced, we want to walk forward in faithful response to the call of God. Like the Order of the Mustard Seed, we will likely come up with some kind of ceremony to initiate the order as we walk into the future together. As Henri Nouwen wrote, a Rule offers “creative boundaries within which God’s loving presence can be recognized and celebrated. It does not prescribe but invite, it does not force but guide, it does not threaten but warn, it does not instill fear but points to love. In this it is a call to freedom, freedom to love.” By analogy, a rule of life is like the glasses we wear. We don’t look at our glasses, but rather they assist us precisely because they are transparent. We look through the lenses so that we can focus and see clearly, paying attention to what is important in everyday life.

Our rule will involve three dimensions: God, self and other. Practices will be defined around inward and outward rhythm, both mission and devotion: a covenant of prayer, study, and hospitality, available to God and free for His kingdom.

7 Comments

  1. Matt said,

    February 19, 2008 at 4:11 pm

    Len,

    Your point that a follower of Christ has to be rooted in an alternative culture is so important to me. I feel strongly that evangelicals have been parasites on the mainstream consumer culture, and that until we initiate an alternative logic, we will not be able to display the glory of Christ. I am intrigued by the direction many are taking toward forming orders, and will follow your progress with interest. Thanks!

  2. The Fear of Cultural Interaction « MER Christianity said,

    February 20, 2008 at 9:15 pm

    [...] Evangelicalism does not present itself as a counterculture. It offers no contrast to the ways of vanilla suburbia, but insists that the blessings of Christ can be enjoyed without any sacrifices. Emergents are absolutely right in criticizing these aspects of evangelical culture, and in searching for deeper bonds. (See Len at NextReformation on a move toward missional orders here.) We are seeing the beginnings of a flight from the corpse of Christianity at the mall. [...]

  3. ron cole said,

    February 21, 2008 at 4:01 am

    Len, this so resonates around where my headspace has been latley. You know this is that time of the year ” church AGM’s.” I listen to friends share their experience, struggles, anxiety, frustration…it all seems to get magnified this time of year. #’s + $$$ = sustainability. It’s all so wrong. There has to be a radical shift in faith community, that are an alternative, radical, and authentic…and sustainable. I’m excited to hear about you and your friends, I keep you and your vision in my prayers…may you feel the wind in your sails.Peace…Ron+

  4. Carman said,

    March 1, 2008 at 6:01 am

    Len, the whole concept of missional order really resonates with me. Obviously, by my questions that follow, you can tell I am new at this, but am desiring to learn for the purpose of seeing this become a reality in my life.
    How would you explain the difference to someone between a missional order and a local church. In speaking to someone about initiating a missional order, what would you communicate the primary differences of the two as being? How would starting and becoming involved in a missional order differ from starting and becoming involved in a local church?

  5. len said,

    March 1, 2008 at 9:39 am

    It might help to start with a logical distinction. All horses have four legs, but not all things with four legs are horses. So, all churches involve a component of covenant or shared practices, but not all structures that involve covenant or shared practices are churches. A missional order, or a rule of life (a rule forms the heart of an “order” – “order” means “ordered” and is shorthand for rule, from “regula” which means rhythm. A rule is a means to an and, the lens that focuses intention, and through which we gain new perspective on all of life.

    A covenant is not a vehicle for control but provides a focus and center. Henri Nouwen writes, “A Rule offers ‘creative boundaries within which God’s loving presence can be recognised and celebrated.’ It does not prescribe but invite, it does not force but guide, it does not threaten but warn, it does not instil fear but points to love. In this it is a call to freedom, freedom to love.” ok, more to come..

  6. Carman said,

    March 1, 2008 at 12:07 pm

    Thanks for the explanation. I’m staying tuned for the “more to come.”

  7. NextReformation » on a scent (2) said,

    April 29, 2008 at 12:40 pm

    [...] I want to point to two earlier posts: missional orders – 2 lenses; and a rule of life. [...]