01.22.08
spiritual “fathering” and church leavers
Way back in 2005 Paul Fromont wrote,
“Generally I’m not at all comfortable that contemporary Western Protestant churches take responsibility for “spiritually “fathering†or “mothering†(i.e. nurturing, mentoring, growing, and maturing) followers of Jesus. Reflect for a moment on this question, “how widespread is the practice spiritual direction and mentoring within local church congregations?†In my experience it isn’t particularly widespread despite the popularity, more generally, of “spiritual direction†beyond the fringes of church. Most of us have to seek spiritual directors and direction outside of our local church contexts. In fact, given the blank looks and the spoken misconceptions I wonder how many in our Protestant congregations even know what Spiritual Direction actually is and what it’s helping to do in terms of discipleship?
“So, my sense continues to be that churches generally aren’t very good as “spiritually fathering.†They’re not all that good at nourishing, accompanying, encouraging, and resourcing growth and increasing levels of Christian maturity. I do believe that this inability is ‘forcing’ people to leave churches when they outgrow inflexible church structures and practices and unsympathetic and unhelpful leaders and congregations. At this point I’m mindful too of Alan Jamieson’s statistics which indicate that a large number of the so-called “de-churched†had been long terms members and “hands on†leaders in churches. These “leavers†aren’t loosely connected “fly-by-nighters†to the Christian faith.”
Paul points back to the essay by Andrew Pritchard that generated this reflection. Essentially Andrew is reflecting through the lens of Fowler’s stages of growth as he thinks about church leavers. Some of us did outgrow the nest; but leaving wasn’t a solution per se…
The larger issue of formation and spiritual growth remains. Some of us are discussing missional orders as a way to address the issue. We “protestants” probably need to be looking at other models including spiritual direction. But I agree.. we don’t “do fathering” very well, and in part his is because the system itself became rational more than relational and involved authority in offices rather than connecting it to wisdom. Where do we go from here?


church said,
January 22, 2008 at 10:09 pm
Wonderful phrases on spiritual fathering and mothering by Paul I think he is having a good discipleship on this part of Christianity.
abmo said,
January 22, 2008 at 11:33 pm
We don’t do “fathering” well because we have no fathers. A father is a person who walked with God experiencially for at least 15-20 years. No model is going to replace experience with God. And fathers can only take care for so many children.
The church is good at bringing babies into the world and then expect them to walk and care for others when they are still babies themselves. Someday perhaps, we will learn that the charismatic person with passionate zeal is not necessary a father. But then again, why would we learn that?
My 2 cents are at http://windblownhope.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/the-101-of-discipleship/
Abuse By Negligence « MER Christianity said,
January 23, 2008 at 10:29 pm
[...] January 24, 2008 in Christianity, Fallen, Frank Viola, George Barna, abuse, authority, churches, emergent, emerging church The emergent conversation often returns to the theme of churches’ abuse of souls. In a post earlier this week, Len at NextReformation gave me another angle on soul-abuse, namely that the damage can come not only from aggression but also from neglect. [...]