12.05.08

living gently in a violent world

Posted in community, formation, learning, mission, reviews at 5:30 am by len

coverAmong the books that have appeared spontaneously in the last month are two that showed up this past Tuesday. IVP is publishing a “Resources for Reconciliation” series, and pairing up a theologian and a practitioner for each book. The two books that arrived this week are the title above, pairing Jean Vanier and Stanley Hauerwas, and Reconciling All Things, pairing Emmanuel Katongale and Chris Rice. Because I know Jean Vanier’s work and the history of the L’Arche communities, it was this title I cracked first. Honestly, I could barely wait and the rewards were not long in arriving.

The introduction is penned by John Swinton, and as you read you may feel yourself questioning the assumptions you have made about ability.. and disability… about humanity, health, and even about heaven. You may begin to see the cross.. and redemption.. through unfamiliar lenses. John relates this story.

“A few years ago I was teaching a course on pastoral care. It was a distance-learning course [and among] the students was one who had no sight and another who was profoundly deaf and spoke through an interpreter. At one point in the class, people where sharing their various spiritual experiences. The woman who was deaf, Angela, began to tell us about a dream she’d had. In that dream she has met with Jesus in heaven. She and Jesus talked for some time, and she said she had never experienced such peace and joy. “Jesus was everything I had hoped he would be,” she said. “And his signing was amazing!” (13)

A bit earlier he relates that advancing technology means that within a few more years in France there will be no Down Syndrome children born because they will all have been aborted. But is this progress? Is this a move toward a better world? Setting aside even the question of the morality of abortion, is this a sign of a better world? The writer quotes his friend John, who has Down Syndrome: “That doesn’t make us feel very welcome, does it?” (12) One of the casualties of advancing technology, no less than the pace at which we live, is compassion.

In the story above it is evident that for Angela heaven’s perfection did not involve healing.. but acceptance. It was a place where relational and communication barriers that exist for her were finally removed. What had led to exclusion and anxiety no longer mattered. In the second chapter Stan Hauerwas quotes Paul Virilio: the dominant form violence takes in modernity is speed. Hauerwas writers,

“Gary was.. mentally disabled. Gary also read Scripture [in the gatherings]. It would take a long time. But for the church to learn to wait for the lesser member to speak is to witness to the world a different way of living..” (45).

Chapter 2 is where I began to slow down.. because, in part, this is what Stan Hauerwas asks of us in the second chapter. And this is what he maintains that L’Arche has to offer us: it calls us to slow down. Patience is the first thing we learn when we begin to deepen our humanity. “L’Arche offers a kind of time, a kind of patience and a kind of placedness that comes from faithfulness and produces a different understanding of catholicity. That is how L’Arche helps the church find the gospel.”

If God really chose the weak things of the world to shame the strong, and the foolish things to shame the wise, then ecclesiology should begin with 1 Cor. 12:22. Radical? Crazy? Yes.

The book is 103 pages.

4 Comments

  1. Paul Fromont said,

    December 7, 2008 at 1:44 pm

    Sounds like a great book Len. Thanks for the heads up… :-)

  2. NextReformation » time, space, and dwelling.. said,

    March 20, 2009 at 12:26 pm

    [...] I had exactly the same feeling when I examined a catechetical manual for those preparing for baptism at a large Mennonite Brethren church. I saw propositions.. divorced from their place in salvation history. The goal was obviously knowledge and adherence to belief, more than it was entering a life or a relationship with a living Savior who is manifest in a living community and a living tradition. Truth that is de-storied is de-incarnate, impersonal and mere technique. This is not “truth” in the biblical sense, which is always personal and relational. Well.. all this connects very strongly back to some of the work Parker Palmer did in “To Know as We are Known.” Knowledge in modernity was a means of violence. More recently Jean Vanier and Stanley Hauerwas wrote, “Living Gently in a Violent World.” [...]

  3. Duromine information. said,

    April 14, 2009 at 1:44 am

  4. NextReformation » Twitter and the way we live.. said,

    June 30, 2009 at 11:23 am

    [...] Our context is that we are shaped to prefer the sound-byte by our western media: the sound-and video-bytes of interpretive news on CNN; the text-bytes on our cell phones; the limitations of Twitter; not least of all the intense need we have to solve problems and move on. However much we decry it, we all want the quick fix. We damage the texture of our relationships and the texture of the gospel when we resort to the quick fix. (Paul Virilio – “the dominant form violence takes in modernity is speed.” And Noam Chomsky offers a revealing perspective in this YouTube short on “concision“). [...]