|
Karl Barth on the Emergent Church Conversation
Recently Karl Barth was seen haunting the halls of a certain eastern seminary. While Barth apparently died in 1968, his spirit has lingered on through his words and his writing and his passion for God and His Kingdom.
Karl was interested in engaging the emerging church conversation, even if posthumously. Sitting at a PC in a student lounge, he was surfing some of the more prominent blog sites when he ran across Scot McKnight's post of November 2nd. In response to Scot, he quoted from one of his better known works, "Evangelical Theology." Scot's thoughts preceed Karl's comments in red...
First.. those squarely in the em (emerging movement) are post-rational, denying the ability to prove meta-narratives on rational, independent, objective grounds. In other words, it contends that the only way meta-narratives can be finally persuasive is if one believes the meta-narrative itself. Faith is required for the meta-narrative to be truthful... This is somewhat Augustinian: I believe in order to understand.
"In [Israel's] history He makes Himself known.. God can be called the "truth" only when truth is understood in the Greek sense of the word aletheia.. the event of His self-disclosure." p.9
Second, those in the em believe in incarnational and contextual living. Truth is relational. The Emerging Movement is an attempt to “do church locally” in light of the postmodern condition of our world.
Third, the em form of postmodernity operates with a chastened rationality. Here’s why: they know that the Subject (you and I when we are attempting to “know”) is always involved to one degree or another in knowing the Object (what you and I are trying to “know”). Humans are limited and fallible — every last one of us. Some call this the noetic effects of the Fall.
“ No dogma or article of the creed can be simply taken over untested by theology from ecclesiastical antiquity; each must be measured, from the very beginning, by the Holy Scripture and the Word of God.” p.42
Fourth, Absolute Truth can only be predicated of God himself. Sometimes evangelicals affirm that they believe in absolute truth... But, only God is Absolute Truth and all our articulations of truth partake of that Truth but our articulations are not equal to the source. Only God is Absolute Truth and only God can know truth absolutely.
Fifth, the em’s embrace of chastened rationality is the embrace of our human condition, of our need for humility in what we say, and in the need we have for one another to come to the truth of the gospel. The em believes that only by trusting in God, and by living in the way of Jesus, and by living out as a community of faith, do we strike home to truth. Truth is a relationship to God that is lived out and articulated.
Sixth, the em affirms that God’s truth, His most complete word, is to be found in Jesus Christ and in the scriptural witness to Him. They affirm the Scripture as the “script” for the “theo-drama” we are summoned to live out in this world. (Kevin Vanhoozer). The Spirit who guides and speaks today is the Spirit who inspires Scripture.
"Only the Holy Spirit can help a theology that is or has become unspiritual. Only the Spirit can assist theology to become enduringly conscious and aware of the misery of its arbitrary devices of controlling him. Only where the Spirit is sighed, cried, and prayed for does he become present and newly active." p. 58
Seventh, the em operates with a praxis and orthodoxy model rather than an orthodoxy model: in other words, it believes that orthodoxy is practiced (since truth is ultimately relational) as much as it is articulated. (This is a “both-and” approach.) This is a needed challenge to the orthodoxy model that often slips into credo as the best expression of the Christian faith. Rather faith is proclaimed by its performance, and performed by proclamation.
Eighth, the em is smitten by a narrative or story form to theology and less committed to a propositional form of theology. The work of God to redeem us is a narrative of God’s work in the world: the Bible is not so much a systematic theology as it is a story of God’s mighty acts, the history of God’s work with God’s people in God’s world.
Ninth, the “certainty” of the em emerges from love and trust of God, from loving Jesus Christ, and from being immersed in the love of the Holy Spirit. I know Jesus died for me not because I can prove it but because I trust God’s work in Jesus Christ. That is the only kind of proof I can offer for love. I love, therefore, I know I love and am loved. This is an experiential and trans-rational knowledge.
"No one can become and remain a theologian unless he is compelled again and again to be astonished at himself... who am I to be a theologian? I have finally and profoundly become a man made to wonder at himself by this wonder of God.. I can no longer be released from this confrontation... As a recipient of grace, a man can only become active in gratitude." p.72-73
Tenth, grace rules for the em because it deprives me of being able to prove God to myself, to others, and to God. Grace tells me that I can only know God by casting aside my own mental arrogance and find Truth in God who is Truth.
|
Emerging Women / Renovare / Christians for Biblical Equality / Soul Horizon / OpenSource Theology / Jesus Radicals / Regeneration / New Phuture / The Off Ramp / Society for Kingdom Living / Cutting Edge / Relevant Magazine / Shoot the Messenger / Vine and Branches / Sacred Future / Tribal Generation / Reality / Waves Church / Matthew's House / Praxis / Post Boomer / FutureChurch / MethodX / TheOOZE / ginkworld / ::seven:: / emergent village / Highway Video / emerging church / Sojourners / Ship of Fools / Beyond / Next-Wave / Small Fire / ThePowerSurge / dtour
|
© 2005-2006 Len Hjalmarson.
Last Updated on January 24, 2006